The phrase signifies an error encountered inside the Conflict utility on the Android working system. Particularly, it denotes a failure to correctly save or persist the person’s configuration settings. This could manifest in numerous methods, resembling the appliance reverting to default settings upon restart, the lack to use newly configured guidelines, or basic instability within the utility’s conduct associated to configuration administration. An occasion of this might be a person establishing customized proxy guidelines which are then misplaced after closing and reopening the appliance, resulting in a lack of desired community configurations.
The decision of this subject is essential for sustaining desired utility performance and person expertise. An incapacity to avoid wasting configurations can result in frustration, inefficient use of assets (requiring reconfiguration repeatedly), and probably compromised safety if desired proxy or filtering guidelines can’t be reliably utilized. Traditionally, a majority of these configuration persistence errors can come up from points associated to file permissions on the Android system, bugs inside the utility’s code concerning file writing, or interference from different purposes impacting storage entry. Addressing these errors enhances utility stability and person belief.
Understanding the underlying causes and efficient troubleshooting steps is important to successfully resolve cases the place the appliance encounters this saving failure. Subsequent dialogue will give attention to figuring out potential causes, sensible diagnostic strategies, and customary options to rectify the error and guarantee correct utility configuration persistence.
1. Storage permission restrictions
Storage permission restrictions instantly impression the flexibility of the Conflict utility on Android to persistently retailer its configuration settings. Inadequate or denied storage permissions forestall the appliance from writing to the system’s storage, a essential course of for saving person preferences, guidelines, and different configurations. This restriction steadily manifests as an error through the configuration saving course of.
-
Android’s Permission Mannequin
Android working methods make use of a permission mannequin that requires purposes to explicitly request entry to system assets, together with storage. This mannequin prevents purposes from arbitrarily accessing delicate person knowledge. If the appliance has not been granted the mandatory permissions, makes an attempt to avoid wasting the configuration to storage will fail, resulting in the noticed error.
-
Affect on Configuration Recordsdata
The configuration settings for the appliance are sometimes saved in recordsdata situated inside the utility’s designated storage space. Storage permission restrictions forestall the appliance from creating, modifying, and even accessing these recordsdata. With out the flexibility to put in writing to those configuration recordsdata, the appliance can not save any adjustments made by the person. This leads to the person’s settings being misplaced upon closing and reopening the appliance.
-
Person Revocation of Permissions
Even when the appliance initially had storage permissions, a person can revoke these permissions at any time by the Android settings. If the appliance makes an attempt to avoid wasting configuration knowledge after the person has revoked storage entry, the saving course of will fail. The person will encounter the error and their settings is not going to be preserved. This could occur inadvertently after an OS replace adjustments permission defaults.
-
Scoped Storage Limitations
Newer variations of Android implement scoped storage, additional proscribing entry to exterior storage. With scoped storage, an utility can solely instantly entry its personal devoted listing. Trying to avoid wasting the configuration outdoors of this designated space, even when basic storage permission is granted, will nonetheless lead to a saving error. The applying wants to stick to scoped storage tips.
In abstract, storage permission restrictions function a main explanation for configuration saving failures inside the utility on Android. The Android permission mannequin, impacts on config recordsdata, person revocation of permissions, and scoped storage limitations work together to generate this subject, highlighting the significance of granting and sustaining essential storage permissions for the appliance to perform appropriately and persistently save person configurations.
2. Configuration file corruption
Configuration file corruption stands as a big instigator of the error, whereby the Conflict utility fails to avoid wasting its settings on Android. Broken or incomplete configuration recordsdata impede the appliance’s capability to correctly load and save essential parameters, resulting in a persistent save failure message.
-
Incomplete Writes Throughout Save Operations
An incomplete write operation, usually ensuing from sudden utility termination, energy loss, or system crashes, can depart the configuration file in a corrupted state. For instance, if the appliance is actively writing to its configuration file when the Android system unexpectedly shuts down, the write course of could also be interrupted halfway. The ensuing file will include solely a partial dataset, resulting in errors when the appliance makes an attempt to learn from or append to this corrupted file. This could manifest as lacking configurations, incorrect rule units, or basic instability. Subsequent makes an attempt to avoid wasting the configuration may also fail, perpetuating the error.
-
Disk Errors and Storage Media Points
Underlying storage media issues, resembling dangerous sectors or file system errors, can induce configuration file corruption. If the bodily location on the system’s storage the place the configuration file resides turns into corrupted, the appliance shall be unable to reliably learn from or write to that file. For example, if a essential portion of the file containing rule definitions is saved on a foul sector, the appliance might not be capable to parse these guidelines, leading to unpredictable conduct or the configuration saving error. Checking storage well being can usually reveal the basis trigger.
-
Software program Bugs and Coding Errors
Defects inside the utility’s codebase itself can contribute to configuration file corruption. Programming errors within the file dealing with logic, resembling incorrect file pointers or improper knowledge serialization, may end up in the appliance writing invalid knowledge to the configuration file. As an illustration, if the appliance incorrectly calculates the scale of an information construction earlier than writing it to the file, it might overwrite adjoining knowledge, successfully corrupting the configuration. Such coding errors necessitate utility updates to rectify.
-
Exterior Interference from Third-Celebration Functions
Sure third-party purposes, resembling file managers or safety instruments, would possibly inadvertently corrupt the configuration file. Overly aggressive file cleansing processes, for instance, might determine the configuration file as pointless knowledge and try to change or delete it, resulting in corruption. Equally, safety purposes using defective file integrity checks might flag authentic components of the configuration file as suspicious, leading to unintended modifications. Avoiding or fastidiously configuring such software program can mitigate this threat.
These aspects collectively show that configuration file corruption can stem from various sources, starting from hardware-level points to software-related defects and exterior interferences. Every of those mechanisms can independently or collaboratively set off the configuration saving failure inside the utility. Addressing these points necessitates a multifaceted strategy, encompassing storage diagnostics, software program updates, and scrutiny of third-party utility conduct, all geared in the direction of preserving the integrity and accessibility of the appliance’s configuration recordsdata.
3. Inadequate space for storing
Inadequate space for storing on an Android system instantly contributes to the error, stopping the Conflict utility from efficiently saving its configuration. When the accessible storage is depleted or falls beneath a essential threshold, the working system restricts file writing operations, together with these essential for saving utility settings. This constraint triggers the noticed configuration saving error, hindering correct utility performance.
-
File Creation and Modification Failure
The Conflict utility requires enough free area to create or modify configuration recordsdata. When storage is missing, the appliance’s try to put in writing configuration knowledge leads to a failure. This could manifest as an incapacity to avoid wasting new guidelines, replace proxy settings, or persist any user-defined preferences. The applying then presents the error, indicating that the saving operation couldn’t be accomplished as a consequence of storage limitations. For instance, a person would possibly regulate their proxy settings, solely to have these settings revert to default upon restarting the appliance as a result of failed save operation.
-
Working System Useful resource Allocation
Android allocates space for storing for purposes to make the most of for numerous operations, together with knowledge caching, momentary recordsdata, and configuration storage. Inadequate storage can impression the working system’s capability to allocate the mandatory assets to the appliance, leading to saving failures. This subject arises when the working system prioritizes important system features, probably depriving the appliance of the mandatory space for storing to finish its duties. The configuration error turns into a consequence of this useful resource allocation battle.
-
Affect on Momentary Recordsdata and Cache
Earlier than saving the configuration file, the appliance might create momentary recordsdata or make the most of a cache to stage the info. Restricted storage hinders the creation and administration of those intermediate recordsdata, resulting in problems through the saving course of. If the appliance can not allocate the mandatory area for these momentary recordsdata, it can not correctly assemble and save the entire configuration. This could create a loop of failed saves as the appliance makes an attempt to put in writing the settings.
-
Configuration Backup and Restore Limitations
Some purposes help configuration backup and restore functionalities, which require enough space for storing to retailer backup copies of the configuration. In eventualities the place storage is restricted, the appliance might fail to create backups or correctly restore earlier configurations. This exacerbates the problem, because the person can not revert to a working configuration if the present one is corrupted or misplaced. This performance is compromised when the system studies no storage accessible.
The confluence of those components underscores the essential function of accessible space for storing in stopping the error. The shortcoming to create or modify recordsdata, limitations imposed by the working system’s useful resource allocation, challenges in managing momentary recordsdata, and compromised backup functionalities coalesce to manifest because the configuration saving failure, underscoring the connection between accessible storage and dependable utility conduct.
4. Software code defects
Software code defects characterize a basic supply of the “conflict for android “. Imperfections inside the utility’s programming logic can instantly impede its capability to precisely save configuration settings, ensuing within the manifestation of the error. Analyzing these defects is essential for understanding the underlying causes and implementing efficient options.
-
Improper File Dealing with Routines
Insufficient or faulty file dealing with routines inside the utility’s code can result in failures through the configuration saving course of. For instance, if the appliance makes use of incorrect file pointers or fails to correctly shut a file after writing, the configuration file might develop into corrupted or incompletely saved. The result’s the “conflict for android ” showing upon subsequent utility restarts, as the unfinished or broken configuration file can’t be correctly loaded. This could additionally embrace race circumstances throughout concurrent learn/write operations resulting in corruption.
-
Incorrect Information Serialization/Deserialization
The processes of knowledge serialization (changing knowledge constructions right into a format appropriate for storage) and deserialization (reconstructing knowledge constructions from saved knowledge) are essential for persisting configuration settings. Defects in these processes can result in knowledge loss or corruption through the save/load operations. For example, if the appliance incorrectly serializes a posh configuration object, essential parameters could also be omitted or misrepresented when saved to the configuration file. Upon reloading, the appliance will fail to correctly reconstruct the configuration, triggering the “conflict for android ” and probably inflicting unpredictable utility conduct. A selected case would possibly contain failure to deal with totally different knowledge varieties correctly.
-
Reminiscence Administration Points
Faulty reminiscence administration practices inside the utility can not directly result in configuration saving failures. Reminiscence leaks, buffer overflows, or improper reminiscence allocation may cause the appliance to develop into unstable and probably crash through the configuration saving course of. A crash throughout a save operation can depart the configuration file in an incomplete or inconsistent state, resulting in the “conflict for android “. Poorly managed reminiscence also can restrict the assets accessible to the appliance for writing to the config file. For example, the system might terminate the appliance as a consequence of excessive reminiscence consumption, interrupting the saving course of and resulting in knowledge loss.
-
Exception Dealing with Deficiencies
Inadequate or inappropriate exception dealing with can forestall the appliance from gracefully recovering from errors encountered through the saving course of. If the appliance encounters an sudden error (e.g., a file entry violation) and lacks correct exception dealing with, it might terminate abruptly, leaving the configuration file in an inconsistent state. Conversely, an exception could be improperly caught and suppressed. It is a downside as a result of the method might fail silently, leading to knowledge loss. This silent failure will result in the conflict for android upon restart. Correct exception dealing with mechanisms would enable the appliance to log the error, probably get well, and forestall the configuration saving failure, finally mitigating the prevalence of the “conflict for android “.
These cases underscore the inherent hyperlink between utility code defects and the emergence of “conflict for android “. Correcting these programming imperfections necessitates rigorous code evaluate, complete testing, and adherence to safe coding practices to make sure the sturdy and dependable saving of configuration settings inside the utility, thus stopping the error and enhancing the general person expertise. Common software program updates are key to mitigating code defects.
5. Working system updates
Working system updates can instantly contribute to cases of the “conflict for android “. The introduction of latest safety protocols, altered file system permissions, or adjustments to the Android Storage Entry Framework inside an working system replace can disrupt the appliance’s capability to avoid wasting configuration knowledge appropriately. For instance, a current Android replace might implement stricter guidelines concerning file entry, thereby denying the appliance the mandatory permissions to change its configuration recordsdata, even when such permissions had been beforehand granted. In such eventualities, the appliance fails to persist the person’s settings, resulting in the error.
Additional, working system updates can introduce unexpected compatibility points with present purposes. Updates might alter utility programming interfaces (APIs) that the Conflict utility depends upon for file dealing with or storage entry. If the appliance just isn’t designed to accommodate these adjustments, saving makes an attempt may end up in errors. Furthermore, updates can typically set off permission resets, successfully revoking the storage permissions that the appliance beforehand possessed, thereby hindering its capability to avoid wasting configurations. For example, an replace would possibly robotically disable “Enable storage entry” and require the person to manually re-enable it. This requires diligent developer consideration and subsequent app updates to handle these cases.
In abstract, working system updates can inadvertently create an atmosphere the place the appliance’s configuration saving mechanisms are compromised, resulting in the emergence of the “conflict for android “. Understanding the potential impression of working system adjustments on utility performance is important for each builders and customers. Software builders ought to proactively check their software program in opposition to beta variations of working system updates to determine and handle compatibility points. Customers ought to guarantee the appliance is up to date to the most recent model to profit from bug fixes and compatibility enhancements, thereby minimizing the chance of encountering such errors.
6. Interfering purposes
Interfering purposes can not directly precipitate the “conflict for android “. The coexistence of purposes competing for system assets, notably those who closely make the most of storage or manipulate file methods, can create circumstances that result in configuration saving failures. For example, a very aggressive system optimization software would possibly prematurely terminate the appliance’s save course of, leading to an incomplete or corrupted configuration file. Equally, sure safety purposes, whereas intending to guard system integrity, might misidentify the configuration file as a possible menace and forestall it from being written. The confluence of such interactions disrupts the traditional operation of the saving course of.
Take into account a situation the place a file supervisor utility, configured to robotically clear momentary recordsdata, inadvertently deletes a brief configuration file that the Conflict utility is actively utilizing throughout its save operation. This sudden removing of a essential useful resource can result in the saving course of being interrupted mid-write. Additional, the concurrent operation of a number of purposes partaking in heavy I/O operations can result in disk rivalry, slowing down the save course of and rising the probability of knowledge corruption. Another interference situation might contain a background course of regularly monitoring file system adjustments, thus locking the config file, making it not possible to avoid wasting. Diagnosing this requires cautious monitoring of system exercise and figuring out purposes with extreme useful resource consumption or those who instantly work together with the appliance’s storage space.
In abstract, the connection between interfering purposes and the conflict for android stems from useful resource rivalry, file system manipulation, and safety interactions. Managing and controlling the purposes operating concurrently on the Android system is paramount. Prioritizing important operations, avoiding overly aggressive optimization instruments, and thoroughly configuring safety purposes can decrease the potential for interference and mitigate the prevalence of the configuration saving failure.
7. Incorrect file paths
Incorrect file paths characterize a tangible supply of the configuration saving error inside the utility on Android units. When the appliance makes an attempt to avoid wasting or load its configuration file utilizing an incorrect path, the operation inevitably fails. This misdirection prevents the appliance from finding and writing to the supposed storage location, consequently resulting in the system displaying a saving error message. For instance, if the appliance is coded to retailer its configuration file in `/sdcard/conflict/config.yaml`, however a change inside the working system or the appliance itself alters this anticipated path, the appliance’s saving makes an attempt shall be directed in the direction of a non-existent or inaccessible location, ensuing within the error.
The importance of file paths inside utility performance can’t be overstated. They perform because the handle by which the appliance interfaces with the storage system. An incorrect file path might stem from numerous causes, together with misconfiguration, coding errors, or adjustments within the Android atmosphere. Addressing the problem includes verifying that the appliance is utilizing the right and up-to-date file path, and that the required path has the mandatory permissions to permit the appliance to put in writing knowledge. Using debugging instruments and file system inspection to verify the validity of the file path is paramount in figuring out and rectifying the configuration saving downside.
In abstract, incorrect file paths act as a essential obstacle to the correct configuration saving course of, instantly contributing to the error. Understanding and verifying file paths are important steps in diagnosing and resolving saving points inside the utility. Correction necessitates confirming the appliance makes use of a sound, accessible, and permitted path that aligns with the Android atmosphere, guaranteeing the dependable preservation of utility settings. Common testing, notably after working system updates, also can be sure that file paths proceed to perform as supposed.
8. Improper shutdown course of
An improper shutdown means of an Android system throughout a save operation by the Conflict utility generally is a direct catalyst for the configuration saving error. When the system just isn’t shut down by the usual process, it will possibly interrupt essential write operations and result in configuration file corruption or incomplete saves, thereby ensuing within the configuration save failure message upon restart.
-
Interrupted File Write Operations
When an Android system is abruptly powered off or crashes through the means of saving the Conflict utility’s configuration, the write operation to the configuration file is prematurely terminated. This leads to an incomplete file save, leaving the configuration file corrupted or lacking important knowledge. Subsequent makes an attempt to load the configuration will fail, displaying the configuration save error. For instance, a person makes adjustments to their proxy settings inside the Conflict utility, after which powers off the system with out correctly exiting the appliance. The settings are probably misplaced or corrupted, as a result of interrupted write operation.
-
File System Inconsistencies
An improper shutdown can result in file system inconsistencies, the place metadata related to the configuration file turns into inaccurate or mismatched. The file system, liable for organizing and monitoring recordsdata on the storage media, could be left in a unstable state throughout an abrupt termination. Such inconsistencies can forestall the appliance from correctly accessing or modifying its configuration file. An working system might try and appropriate this on reboot; nonetheless, the injury to the file itself may very well be irreversible. This, once more, triggers the appliance saving error message.
-
Lack of Configuration Information
Throughout a correct shutdown, purposes are given a possibility to avoid wasting their state and clear up any momentary recordsdata. Nevertheless, an improper shutdown bypasses this course of, rising the chance of dropping unsaved knowledge. The Conflict utility’s configuration settings, if not dedicated to persistent storage previous to the shutdown, are merely misplaced. For example, customized guidelines or proxy settings might not be utilized after restarting the appliance, requiring the person to re-enter them. This underscores the significance of permitting the system to close down usually to stop lack of settings.
-
Elevated Danger of File Corruption
Abruptly terminating the system’s energy throughout energetic file write operations heightens the chance of configuration file corruption. The configuration file is prone to containing incomplete or inconsistent knowledge, rendering it unusable by the appliance. This could require deleting and recreating the configuration file, which leads to the lack of settings and requires ranging from scratch. Information corruption and loss is way increased when the configuration file is saved on flash storage, in comparison with arduous drives. This emphasizes the fragile nature of recordsdata and the significance of correct shutdown.
In the end, the correlation between an improper shutdown course of and the looks of the “conflict for android ” lies within the interruption and destabilization of file saving operations. The implications of such interruptions can vary from minor knowledge loss to extreme file corruption, all of which consequence within the person encountering the saving error upon utility restart. Adhering to the usual shutdown process is essential to minimizing the chance of those points and sustaining the integrity of the appliance’s configuration.
9. Inadequate reminiscence allocation
The manifestation of the “conflict for android ” could be instantly attributed to inadequate reminiscence allocation through the configuration saving course of. When the Conflict utility makes an attempt to persist its settings, it requires a enough quantity of accessible RAM to briefly retailer the configuration knowledge, carry out essential operations (resembling serialization or compression), and write the file to storage. If the system can not present the wanted reminiscence as a consequence of competing processes or total reminiscence limitations, the saving operation will fail. This failure then presents the person with the error message, indicating the lack to avoid wasting the present configuration. The scarcity of reminiscence restricts the appliance’s capability to perform as supposed and protect person settings, illustrating the essential dependency of the appliance on enough reminiscence assets.
Inadequate reminiscence allocation can come up from a number of sources. A tool with restricted bodily RAM might battle to accommodate the appliance’s reminiscence requests, notably when different memory-intensive duties are operating concurrently. Background processes, resembling automated backups or system updates, can devour a good portion of accessible reminiscence, leaving inadequate assets for the Conflict utility to finish its saving operations. Inefficient reminiscence administration inside the utility itself might exacerbate the problem. For instance, the appliance might leak reminiscence over time, step by step decreasing accessible assets till the saving course of is triggered, at which level the allocation fails. Addressing this downside usually includes terminating pointless purposes, rising swap area (if supported), or updating the appliance to a model with improved reminiscence administration. If issues persist, think about using a tool with elevated RAM.
In abstract, the “conflict for android ” is commonly a direct consequence of inadequate reminiscence allocation, which limits the appliance’s capability to carry out configuration saving operations. Managing reminiscence utilization on the system, coupled with guaranteeing the appliance is up to date with improved reminiscence administration, is paramount in mitigating this subject. The issue highlights the necessity for a balanced strategy, optimizing system useful resource utilization to allow the appliance to perform appropriately and reliably protect person configurations. Due to this fact, customers ought to shut pointless apps and scale back background processes to assist Conflict to avoid wasting the config efficiently.
Regularly Requested Questions
This part addresses frequent inquiries and misconceptions in regards to the “conflict for android configuration saving error.” The purpose is to offer readability and sensible options to the persistent subject.
Query 1: What are probably the most prevalent causes of the configuration saving error?
The configuration saving error sometimes arises from insufficient storage permissions, file corruption, inadequate space for storing, code defects inside the utility itself, working system replace incompatibilities, or interference from different operating purposes.
Query 2: How can storage permission restrictions be addressed?
To grant enough storage permissions, the appliance ought to be accessed by the Android settings menu. Navigate to “Apps,” choose the Conflict utility, and be sure that storage permissions are enabled. Notice that permission standing might change after an working system replace.
Query 3: What steps could be taken to mitigate the chance of configuration file corruption?
To mitigate the chance of file corruption, constantly enable the appliance to correctly shut down, keep away from abrupt system termination, and guarantee enough space for storing. Common backups of the configuration file also can present a restoration level.
Query 4: How does inadequate space for storing contribute to this error, and the way can it’s resolved?
Inadequate space for storing prevents the appliance from writing the configuration file, triggering the error. Resolving this includes liberating up area by deleting pointless recordsdata, clearing caches, or transferring knowledge to exterior storage.
Query 5: How do working system updates have an effect on the appliance’s capability to avoid wasting configurations?
Working system updates can alter storage permissions or introduce API adjustments. Customers are suggested to replace the appliance to the most recent model following an working system replace to profit from compatibility fixes.
Query 6: How do interfering purposes contribute to the configuration saving error, and the way can their impression be minimized?
Interfering purposes, resembling aggressive system optimizers or safety instruments, might disrupt the saving course of. Decrease their impression by fastidiously configuring their conduct or briefly disabling them to look at whether or not the problem resolves.
Addressing this configuration saving error requires a multifaceted strategy. Cautious consideration to storage permissions, file integrity, accessible area, utility updates, and potential conflicts with different purposes is paramount. Diagnosing and resolving these points enhances the general performance of the appliance.
The subsequent part supplies strategies to correctly diagnose “conflict for android”.
Troubleshooting the Configuration Saving Error
The following pointers present a structured strategy to resolving the configuration saving error inside the Conflict utility on Android. Adhering to this course of can facilitate a extra environment friendly prognosis and answer.
Tip 1: Confirm Storage Permissions. Verify that the appliance has been granted the mandatory storage permissions inside the Android settings. Navigate to the appliance settings and examine for storage entry rights. Re-grant permissions if essential.
Tip 2: Guarantee Adequate Storage House. Verify the system’s accessible storage. Unlock area by deleting pointless recordsdata, clearing cached knowledge, or transferring content material to exterior storage.
Tip 3: Evaluate Configuration File Integrity. Study the configuration file for corruption. If accessible, open the file and search for anomalies or inconsistencies. A identified good backup ought to be used to overwrite the present file.
Tip 4: Replace the Software. Verify for accessible updates for the appliance on the Google Play Retailer. Builders usually launch updates that handle bugs and enhance compatibility, together with these associated to file saving operations.
Tip 5: Determine Interfering Functions. Briefly disable not too long ago put in purposes or these identified for aggressive useful resource administration, resembling battery savers or system optimizers, to evaluate whether or not they’re interfering with the configuration saving course of.
Tip 6: Verify File Paths. Confirm the configuration file paths inside the utility settings or configuration recordsdata. Guarantee they’re correct and accessible.
Tip 7: Carry out a Clear Restart. Totally shut the appliance and restart the Android system. This could clear momentary recordsdata and resolve conflicts which may be hindering the saving course of.
Implementing these measures affords a scientific path to diagnosing and resolving the prevalent configuration saving error. These actions contribute to a secure, functioning utility expertise.
The next part presents the conclusion for this doc.
Conclusion
This doc has comprehensively explored the “conflict for android ” phenomenon, detailing its origins in components resembling storage permissions, file integrity, reminiscence allocation, and code integrity. It emphasizes the multifaceted nature of the issue and the need of a radical strategy to prognosis and determination. Addressing storage restrictions, verifying enough area, updating the appliance, and recognizing interfering purposes are essential steps in the direction of mitigating this error.
Efficient administration and understanding of the interaction between the appliance, the working system, and exterior components are important for customers. The continued dedication to sustaining a secure atmosphere, mixed with proactive troubleshooting, can considerably scale back cases of this particular subject and comparable configuration-related errors, guaranteeing a extra seamless person expertise. Customers ought to stay conscious of potential causes and implement preventative measures to guard in opposition to the recurring failure of configurations.
